Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 29.3 | 31.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | 2005-03-10 |
| 4.48 x 1.85 x 0.35 inches | 3.50 x 1.77 x 0.94 inches |
| 2.46 ounces | 3.13 ounces |
| $ 450.00 | $ 400.00 |
| -- | 176 x 220 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 182 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.7 | 3.1 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 81,92 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.5 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time | 220 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.2 |
Comparison review
The Samsung SGH-X800 has an overall score of 31.9, which is slightly better than the Motorola MOTOFONE F3's overall score of 29.3. Despite being the best we are comparing here, the Samsung SGH-X800 construction is way thicker and extremely heavier than the Motorola MOTOFONE F3. The Motorola MOTOFONE F3 and the Samsung SGH-X800 count with quite similar CPUs, both of them have the same number of cores.
Motorola MOTOFONE F3 features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung SGH-X800. The Samsung SGH-X800 counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola MOTOFONE F3. The Samsung SGH-X800 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola MOTOFONE F3. The Samsung SGH-X800 counts with a bit longer battery life than Motorola MOTOFONE F3, because it has an 800mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung SGH-X800 is also cheaper than the other phone, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.