Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 42.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Windows Mobile Professional 6.1 | -- |
| 2009-01-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.33 x 2.35 x 0.54 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.20 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 143 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm MSM7201A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Single-Core 528 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.66 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1170mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 298 hours standby time 6.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is a lot better than the Motorola MOTOSURF A3100, getting a score of 80.7 against 42.1. Google Pixel 3 XL's design is noticeably newer and notably thinner than Motorola MOTOSURF A3100's, but it is way heavier. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola MOTOSURF A3100, because it has more RAM and more cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features an incredibly better screen than Motorola MOTOSURF A3100, because it has a way larger display, a way better display pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola MOTOSURF A3100, although it has no external SD slot.
Google Pixel 3 XL takes way better photographs and videos than Motorola MOTOSURF A3100, because it has a camera with way more MP. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola MOTOSURF A3100, because it has a 193 percent larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 3 XL is also cheaper than the Motorola MOTOSURF A3100, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.