Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 24.3 | 27.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Windows Mobile Standard 2002 | -- |
| -- | 2004-09-10 |
| 3.50 x 1.89 x 1.06 inches | 3.46 x 1.81 x 0.86 inches |
| 4.00 ounces | 4.26 ounces |
| $ 45.00 | $ 45.00 |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| 32 MB RAM | -- |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32,77 MB internal memory |
| SD, MMC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| -- | 128 x 96 video resolution |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 760mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 100 hours standby time 5.1 hours talk time | 270 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.16 |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 7270 is better than the Motorola MPx200, having a global score of 27.5 against 24.3. Nokia 7270's body is somewhat thinner but just a little bit heavier than Motorola MPx200. Nokia 7270 has a CPU that is just as good as Motorola MPx200's CPU, both have a 0-Core CPU. Motorola MPx200 and Nokia 7270 have similar screens, although the Nokia 7270 has a way worse resolution of 160 x 128px.
The Nokia 7270 features a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola MPx200, although it has no external SD slot. Nokia 7270 takes a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola MPx200. The Nokia 7270 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Motorola MPx200.
Nokia 7270 and the Motorola MPx200 cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.