Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2021-01-14 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| LTPS | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X is slightly better than Motorola One 5G Ace, getting a general score of 88.1 against 81.6. Although iPhone X is much older than Motorola One 5G Ace, it's construction is lighter and noticeably thinner. The iPhone X has a superior CPU than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and less cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone X has a sharper display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better amount of pixels per display inch and a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. The iPhone X counts with a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola One 5G Ace has a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2716mAh. Motorola One 5G Ace captures slightly better pictures and videos than iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a much more megapixels back camera and a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One 5G Ace. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone X, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One 5G Ace, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.