Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2021-01-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G Ace has an overall score of 81.6, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3's score of 80. Motorola One 5G Ace's construction is notably newer than Google Pixel 3's, although it's incredibly heavier and much thicker. The Google Pixel 3 features just a little better processing power than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Google Pixel 3 features a slightly better looking display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch. Motorola One 5G Ace has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low light environments.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola One 5G Ace features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola One 5G Ace, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.