Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| 2021-01-14 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPS | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra, having a overall score of 81.6 against 77. The Motorola One 5G Ace body is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and extremely thicker than HTC U Ultra. The HTC U Ultra features a bit better looking display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher screen density.
Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a bit superior processor than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a larger number of cores. Motorola One 5G Ace has a better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture for better low light images and video.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola One 5G Ace has a superior battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67% larger battery size.
Motorola One 5G Ace is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.