Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-14 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace is a bit better than LG G7 ThinQ, with an 81.6 score against 81. The Motorola One 5G Ace is a noticeably newer cellphone than the LG G7 ThinQ, although it's noticeably heavier and a lot thicker. LG G7 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The LG G7 ThinQ has an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. LG G7 ThinQ has a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a very superior battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. The Motorola One 5G Ace captures a bit better photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G7 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get LG G7 ThinQ, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.