Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-14 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a general score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than Motorola One 5G Ace's overall score of 81.6. LG G8X ThinQ's body is just a little lighter and thinner than Motorola One 5G Ace, even though it was released only 15 months before. The LG G8X ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG G8X ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit greater screen density. LG G8X ThinQ has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a bit better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and videos and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with superior battery performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG G8X ThinQ is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.