Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-14 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than the Motorola One 5G Ace, with a overall score of 82.5 against 81.6. Despite of the fact that LG V30S ThinQ is way older than Motorola One 5G Ace, it's construction is much thinner and noticeably lighter. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution. The LG V30S ThinQ features much more storage to install applications and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution. Motorola One 5G Ace features a much longer battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One 5G Ace. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola One 5G Ace, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.