Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2021-01-14 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's overall score of 81.3. The Motorola One 5G Ace construction is incredibly newer, but way thicker and heavier than the LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
LG V35 ThinQ features more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola One 5G Ace takes just a bit better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a way more MP camera.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a really longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.