Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G Ace is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, with a general score of 81.6 against 81.2. Although the Motorola One 5G Ace is a lot newer than the LG V40 ThinQ, it's noticeably heavier and much thicker. The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a slightly better screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. Motorola One 5G Ace has a little bit better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola One 5G Ace has a really longer battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V40 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola One 5G Ace, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG V40 ThinQ, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.