Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Motorola One 5G Ace's overall score of 81.6. The LG Velvet design is lighter and a lot thinner than the Motorola One 5G Ace, although they were released only 8 months apart. LG Velvet features a slightly better display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has a just a bit better display density, a quite bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage. LG Velvet has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has more RAM.
LG Velvet captures clearer pictures and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, they both have a back camera with a 48 MP resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Motorola One 5G Ace features superior battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the LG Velvet is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.