Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is much better than the Motorola One 5G Ace, having a 91.2 score against 81.6. LG Wing's body is a little thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola One 5G Ace. LG Wing counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460, a little better pixel number in each inch in the display and a quite bigger screen.
LG Wing counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG Wing has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with better battery duration than LG Wing, because it has a 25% bigger battery size. LG Wing captures much better pictures and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG Wing also counts with higher video frame rate and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One 5G Ace. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG Wing, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola One 5G Ace, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.