Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2021-01-14 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 395.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a general score of 81.6 against 77.4. Motorola One 5G Ace is a a lot newer phone than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it is incredibly thicker and heavier. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels number in each inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little better performance than Motorola One 5G Ace. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola One 5G Ace features a better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a larger aperture and a lot higher resolution camera.
Motorola One 5G Ace not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.