Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2021-01-14 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G Ace has an overall score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the Moto Z2 Play's overall score of 77.4. Even though Motorola One 5G Ace is newer than Moto Z2 Play, it's much heavier and extremely thicker. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play and Motorola One 5G Ace both count with incredibly similar screens, because although the Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a quite smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density.
The Moto Z2 Play's CPU is just as good as Motorola One 5G Ace's processing unit, both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Motorola One 5G Ace takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Moto Z2 Play has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto Z2 Play also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola One 5G Ace features a way better battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z2 Play. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto Z2 Play, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.