Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-14 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a global score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. Motorola One 5G Ace's design is newer and a bit lighter, but a little thicker than nubia Red Magic 3S. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better looking screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, although it has a bit less pixels per display inch and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, they both have a display of the same size. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S's battery performance is just as good as the Motorola One 5G Ace one. The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same camera aperture and a camera with a 48 MP, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Motorola One 5G Ace is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.