Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G Ace has a general score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A5 (2017)'s 75.8 overall score. Motorola One 5G Ace's construction is noticeably newer than the Galaxy A5 (2017)'s, although it is much thicker and extremely heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola One 5G Ace features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola One 5G Ace has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a much better video resolution, a much more megapixels camera in the back and a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
The Motorola One 5G Ace features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Motorola One 5G Ace has a superior battery life than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.