Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is a bit better than Motorola One 5G Ace's global score of 81.6. The Samsung Galaxy A50 design is noticeably lighter and incredibly thinner than the Motorola One 5G Ace, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. Galaxy A50 has a little faster CPU than Motorola One 5G Ace. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater display pixels density. The Motorola One 5G Ace features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with slightly more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a SD card slot that allows 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.