Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is much better than the Motorola One 5G Ace's global score of 81.6. Even though the Galaxy A52 5G and the Motorola One 5G Ace were released only 2 months apart, the Galaxy A52 5G is lighter and thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit sharper screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a just a bit higher display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a better camera than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing images and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.