Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G Ace has a general score of 81.6, which is a bit better than Galaxy A6's 75.8 overall score. Even though Motorola One 5G Ace is newer than the Galaxy A6, it is extremely thicker and a lot heavier. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a larger display and more pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola One 5G Ace features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has more RAM. Motorola One 5G Ace shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a much better resolution back camera and a much higher video resolution.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal memory. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola One 5G Ace, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A6, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.