Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-14 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G Ace has a global score of 81.6, which is a bit better than Galaxy A70's general score of 76.9. Motorola One 5G Ace's construction is newer than Galaxy A70's, but it's heavier and notably thicker. Galaxy A70 has a display that's just as good as Motorola One 5G Ace's display, both of them have a greater pixel count in each inch in the screen, a display with the same size and the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A70 has a processing unit that is very similar to the processor in Motorola One 5G Ace, and although the Galaxy A70 has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy A70 has just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has an external SD slot that supports 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size. The Motorola One 5G Ace captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A70. Both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate.
The Motorola One 5G Ace is more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A70, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.