Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Motorola One 5G Ace, having a global score of 92.9 against 81.6. The Galaxy A71 5G UW body is lighter and thinner than the Motorola One 5G Ace, although both were only released with a couple months difference. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a same size screen and the same count of pixels in each screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a superior camera than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola One 5G Ace features a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way more expensive than Motorola One 5G Ace, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.