Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is slightly better than Motorola One 5G Ace, getting a overall score of 85.2 against 81.6. The Galaxy A9 (2018) body is way thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola One 5G Ace, although it was released 2 years before. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a display that's just as good as the display in Motorola One 5G Ace, although the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a just a bit lower number of pixels per inch of screen, a bit worse 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution and a little smaller display.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a little bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has more RAM.
Motorola One 5G Ace features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 32% larger battery size. The Motorola One 5G Ace shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.