Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than the Motorola One 5G Ace, with an 88.1 score against 81.6. Although Samsung Galaxy F62 and Motorola One 5G Ace were released only a few months apart, the Samsung Galaxy F62 construction is a bit thinner but a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has 4 less cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both have the same count of pixels in each display inch, a screen with the same size and the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy F62 has a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB, the Galaxy F62 also has more internal memory. Galaxy F62 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.