Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-14 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is better than the Motorola One 5G Ace's score of 81.6. Samsung Galaxy Fold is an older and heavier phone than Motorola One 5G Ace, but Samsung made it incredibly thinner anyway. Motorola One 5G Ace and Samsung Galaxy Fold both have very similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1536 x 2152 resolution and a quite larger screen.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Fold features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Motorola One 5G Ace has a bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4380mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One 5G Ace. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola One 5G Ace, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.