Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Motorola One 5G Ace, having a 90.8 score against 81.6. Galaxy Note 20 is a a little bit lighter and thinner phone than the Motorola One 5G Ace, even though both were released only 5 months apart. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both have a greater number of pixels per inch in the display, a display of the same size and the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a larger camera aperture, a lot higher 48 MP resolution back camera and better video frame rates. The Motorola One 5G Ace has better battery performance than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One 5G Ace. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note 20, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola One 5G Ace, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.