Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is way better than Motorola One 5G Ace's 81.6 global score. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is just a little lighter and thinner than the Motorola One 5G Ace, although they were only released 5 months apart. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has a little bit larger display, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a greater screen density. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer videos and photos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels. Motorola One 5G Ace has just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One 5G Ace. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola One 5G Ace, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.