Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace is slightly better than the Galaxy Note 5, having an 81.6 score against 79.3. The Motorola One 5G Ace design is noticeably newer, but notably thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy Note 5. Galaxy Note 5 has a sharper screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher display pixel density.
Motorola One 5G Ace features a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Motorola One 5G Ace has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a higher number of cores.
Motorola One 5G Ace has a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a bigger aperture and a camera with lot more MP. The Motorola One 5G Ace features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Motorola One 5G Ace is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.