Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a score of 81.6 against 80.4. Motorola One 5G Ace's body is incredibly newer, but notably heavier and much thicker than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit more vivid display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixel amount in each inch in the screen.
The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit better processing power than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola One 5G Ace shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a camera with a way higher 48 MP resolution.
The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56 percent more battery size.
Motorola One 5G Ace is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.