Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is a little bit better than the Motorola One 5G Ace, with a global score of 89 against 81.6. The Galaxy Note10 is an older device than Motorola One 5G Ace, but Samsung made it way thinner and a lot lighter anyway. The Galaxy Note10 features a bit better looking display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen pixel density.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing images or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a back camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola One 5G Ace has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43% greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One 5G Ace. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One 5G Ace, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.