Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a little bit better than Motorola One 5G Ace, getting a general score of 86.2 against 81.6. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is older than the Motorola One 5G Ace, it's construction is thinner and just a little bit lighter. Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit sharper display than Motorola One 5G Ace. They have the same quantity of pixels per display inch, the same 1080 x 2400 resolution and a display of the same size. The Motorola One 5G Ace has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a better memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits 24 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola One 5G Ace has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.