Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 395.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is slightly better than Motorola One 5G Ace's 81.6 score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite construction is thinner and lighter than Motorola One 5G Ace, although it was released around a year before. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit superior processor than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit more vivid display than Motorola One 5G Ace. They have a screen of the same size, a greater pixel amount per display inch and an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400. Galaxy S10 Lite has more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a SD card slot that admits 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a slightly better camera than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with a 48 mega-pixels, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with better video frame rate. Motorola One 5G Ace has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.