Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Motorola One 5G Ace's general score of 81.6. The Galaxy S20 FE design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Motorola One 5G Ace, even when they were released with only a couple months difference. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM.
Galaxy S20 FE has a slightly better display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a little bit higher pixels quantity per screen inch. Motorola One 5G Ace has a slightly better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a larger aperture to take better photography in low light environments.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola One 5G Ace has a little better battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy S20 FE costs more than Motorola One 5G Ace, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.