Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Motorola One 5G Ace, having a global score of 98 against 81.6. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older and a bit heavier phone than the Motorola One 5G Ace, but Samsung could make it thinner anyway. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a quite larger screen and a greater pixels density.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures greater photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera and a way higher video definition.
Motorola One 5G Ace and Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G count with very similar batteries performance.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One 5G Ace. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One 5G Ace, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.