Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than Motorola One 5G Ace's global score of 81.6. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is newer and thinner, but just a little heavier than Motorola One 5G Ace. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better looking screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has a little bit bigger display, more pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution.
Motorola One 5G Ace has a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a bit better performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots greater videos and photos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a lot higher video quality. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a battery life that's very similar to the Motorola One 5G Ace one.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One 5G Ace. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola One 5G Ace, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.