Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-14 | -- |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 7.48 ounces | -- |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Motorola One 5G Ace, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 81.6. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is lighter and thinner than the Motorola One 5G Ace. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better looking screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has a quite larger screen, a greater pixel density and a better 1440 x 3088px resolution.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a little bit better storage to install applications and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better camera than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a back camera with a way higher 200 mega-pixels resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality. The Motorola One 5G Ace and the Galaxy S25 Ultra count with incredibly similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.