Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G Ace has an overall score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 score. Motorola One 5G Ace's construction is much newer, but thicker and extremely heavier than Galaxy S5 Sport. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
The Galaxy S5 Sport features a better looking display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater screen density. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 48 GB more internal memory and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a camera with way more mega-pixels and a way bigger diafragm aperture. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Motorola One 5G Ace is more expensive than Galaxy S5 Sport, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.