Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-01-14 | -- |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | -- |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, having an 81.6 score against 80.9. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a much better looking screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater amount of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy S6 Active has a bit superior processor than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processor. Motorola One 5G Ace captures way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a back facing camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution and a bigger aperture.
Motorola One 5G Ace features a superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola One 5G Ace features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola One 5G Ace, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.