Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G Ace has an overall score of 81.6, which is a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 global score. Motorola One 5G Ace is a somewhat heavier phone than the Galaxy S7 Active, but both of them are equally thin. The Motorola One 5G Ace has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has 4 more cores.
Galaxy S7 Active has a much better display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Motorola One 5G Ace features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size. The Motorola One 5G Ace captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S7 Active. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola One 5G Ace, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy S7 Active, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.