Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is a bit better than Motorola One 5G Ace's score of 81.6. Galaxy S9's construction is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola One 5G Ace, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Galaxy S9 features a little faster processor than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a more vivid display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and more pixels per display inch. The Motorola One 5G Ace has a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S9, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola One 5G Ace features a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size. Motorola One 5G Ace features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy S9 not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.