Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPS | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a general score of 81.6 against 80.1. Motorola One 5G Ace's design is newer, lighter and incredibly thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better performance than Motorola One 5G Ace. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola One 5G Ace features a bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11% larger battery size. The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting images or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Motorola One 5G Ace not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.