Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G Ace is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, getting a general score of 81.6 against 81. The Motorola One 5G Ace is a a little bit lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but both are 0.39inches thick. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little more vivid display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher number of pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola One 5G Ace has a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Motorola One 5G Ace has longer battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent more battery capacity. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a much better video resolution and a way more MP back camera.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Motorola One 5G Ace is also cheap compared to the Galaxy XCover Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.