Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than the Motorola One 5G Ace, getting a overall score of 88.5 against 81.6. The Galaxy Z Flip body is lighter and much thinner than the Motorola One 5G Ace, although it was released about 11 months before. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly better screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a just a bit higher screen pixel density and a bit higher 1080 x 2636px resolution. The Motorola One 5G Ace captures slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low light environments and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One 5G Ace. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola One 5G Ace, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.