Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One 5G Ace's 81.6 global score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 and the Motorola One 5G Ace were released with only 7 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is lighter and incredibly thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a quite greater screen density and a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Motorola One 5G Ace features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Motorola One 5G Ace features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Motorola One 5G Ace shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a larger aperture for better low light photography and videos and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One 5G Ace. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola One 5G Ace, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.