Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 395.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Motorola One 5G Ace, having a 92.3 score against 81.6. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than Motorola One 5G Ace, even when both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better looking display than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a little higher 1080 x 2636px resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola One 5G Ace has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a way more MP camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture. The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than the Motorola One 5G Ace, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.