Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Motorola One 5G Ace, getting a global score of 94.6 against 81.6. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Motorola One 5G Ace were released with only 4 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is noticeably heavier but a lot thinner. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit superior CPU than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better looking display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a little bigger screen. The Motorola One 5G Ace takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light images and video and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola One 5G Ace features a little better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One 5G Ace. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola One 5G Ace, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.