Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is better than the Motorola One 5G Ace's 81.6 general score. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is way thinner but notably heavier than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and both were only released with a couple months difference. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a little better processing power than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a screen that's very similar to Motorola One 5G Ace's screen, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a quite lower count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208px. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited environments and a camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.