Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a general score of 86.6, which is a bit better than the Motorola One 5G Ace's score of 81.6. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, we must note that it is also a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a little sharper display than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both of them have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, a screen with the same size and the same pixel density. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a much better camera than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing images or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rates and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Motorola One 5G Ace counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola One 5G Ace has just a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4720mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.