Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 2 XL's overall score of 82.5. Motorola One 5G is a way newer cellphone than the Google Pixel 2 XL, but it is thicker and heavier. Google Pixel 2 XL's processor is just as good as the Motorola One 5G one, they have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a little sharper display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. Motorola One 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also has a way higher resolution back camera, a much bigger sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola One 5G also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Motorola One 5G features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 2 XL. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Motorola One 5G, else you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 2 XL, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.