Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3, having an 84.6 score against 80. Motorola One 5G is a newer cellphone than Google Pixel 3, although it's a lot heavier and thicker. Google Pixel 3 features a bit sharper display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a just a little better pixel amount per inch of screen.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 3 features a little better performance than Motorola One 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Motorola One 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also has a bigger aperture, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos and a camera with a much higher resolution.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola One 5G, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.